Northolt Grange Baptist Church

Partners on a journey

A world of shadows? Taking on the news

Canon Ian Sherwood of the Anglican Church in Istanbul described the pressures faced by Turkey’s tiny Christian minority like this: “You live in a world of shadows, looking over your shoulder all of the time”. His comment was made at the trial just started of five men accused of the brutal murders of a German Christian and two Turkish converts midway through a Bible study on 18 April. The process is being viewed as a test case of how Turkey will protect the rights of its minorities at a time of fierce and rising nationalism. Orhan Kemal Cengiz, the lawyer representing Susanne Geske, widow of one of the victims, said, ‘Hatred towards missionaries has been actively cultivated’. He said the accused, all between 19 and 20, were typical of others who have been ‘indoctrinated’. The Guardian (24/11).

 That shadow-world is also inhabited right now by Gillian Gibbons, the British teacher sentenced to 15 days’ imprisonment by a religious court in Sudan – the teddy called Mohammed story. The decision prompted a joint appeal by Christian and Muslim leaders in her Liverpool home town. The Anglican and Catholic Bishops of Liverpool and Akbar Ali, chairman of Liverpool Mosque appealed for compassion to the Sudanese Government earlier this week. And Revd Jonathan Stott, a governor at the primary schools where Ms Gibbons was a deputy headteacher until the summer talked of her strong Christian faith and how he had led upset former pupils in prayers for her. The Sudan decision has embarrassed British Muslims. The Muslim Council of Britain has called the sentence a ‘gross overreaction’, the Telegraph says. The paper also reports that a diplomatic analyst thought it unlikely Ms Gibbons would serve the full 15-day term and could be freed this weekend. Church of England Newspaper (30/11).

Of course, in some cases it is less easy to delineate right and wrong. The shadows obstruct the light. The upcoming Christmas blockbuster The Golden Compass (see previous post and comment) the film version of part 1 of Philip Pullman’s bestselling His Dark Materials trilogy, is provoking very mixed reactions from church organisations. On the eve of the film’s release (5/12) the Catholic League in the USA has condemned the movie for promoting atheism and for its tyrannical ‘God’ figure. Closer to home, however, Evangelicals Now counsels parents to ‘watch the movie with [their children] and then talk through the issues raised’. The Church of Scotland’s Mission and Discipleship Council go further, commenting that the film ‘provides a golden opportunity to stimulate discussion on a wide range of moral and spiritual issues’. It sees Lyra, the central character, as ‘one of the powerless who turns out to be a saint’ and says the film invites discussion on ‘human purpose and destiny, the abuse of power, the making of choices and the meaning of life’. Christian Today (29/11).

And what kind of a message is sent by the Archbishop of Canterbury’s presiding at a secret Gay Eucharist? According to the Times (30/11), a Lambeth Palace spokeswoman has rebutted criticisms of the Archbishop of Canterbury for presiding at a ‘secret’ Eucharist for lesbian and gay clergy. The service, organised by gay clergy support group Clergy Consultation, was held in private at an undisclosed venue. Representatives of the Church of England Evangelical Council and Anglican Mainstream said offering Communion to people in gay relationships was contrary to biblical teaching. However, Lambeth said the Archbishop’s attendance was consistent with the ‘listening process agreed at the Lambeth Conference [in 1988] as part of the discussions on human sexuality’. Clergy Consultation has several hundred clergy and other members, many of whom are married and faithful to their partners but who struggle with their sexuality, apparently. Mist and shadows? It’s the fact of its being “secret” that somehow stung me.

November 30, 2007 Posted by ngbc | Christianity, Current Events, Taking on the news, What's happening? | | No Comments Yet

The Golden Compass rumpus

Golden Compass Angers Church Groups

It appears that conservative Catholic groups are going to make the The Golden Compass another controversial bestseller. They are up in arms over the ‘His Dark Materials’ series, by author Philip Pullman, a proclaimed atheist. The Church groups claim that this children’s fantasy series promotes an anti-Catholic, atheist agenda.

The Baptist Press claims:

“…He (Pullman) said in a 2001 interview, “I’m trying to undermine the basis of Christian belief,” and two years later told another newspaper, “My books are about killing God…”

Baptist Press article

The books seem more focused on the overbearing authoritarianism of the Church than being anti-doctrinal (a reference to Jesus is not mentioned in any of the books).

Bill Donohue, CEO of the Catholic League, claims that the movie ‘The Golden Compass’ is being used to sell atheism to kids. That it’s a dumbed-down version of the book which is ultimately being used to lure kids into buying the books – where the real message lies.

“The Catholic League wants Christians to boycott this movie precisely because it knows that the film is bait for the books: unsuspecting parents who take their children to see the movie may be impelled to buy the three books as a Christmas present. And no parent who wants to bring their children up in the faith will want any part of these books.”

Baltimore Sun article

It’s a good thing for Pullman that the Christian religion is mature enough with people confident enough in their faith, where they either just dismiss his work or take steps to have people boycott the movie and the books, instead of going out to kill the author.

With publicity like this, the series will be an even bigger hit than it already is. It sure worked in J.K. Rowling’s and Dan Brown’s favor

November 29, 2007 Posted by ngbc | Current Events, Taking on the news, What's happening? | | 2 Comments

A prayer to Father

by Lester Wall

Lord God the Almighty, the Spirit of Truth, God of Seeing—

Be near me Father, for I long to be near You.
I have made You, the Sovereign Lord, my refuge;
I draw near with a true heart, in full assurance of faith.
Your nearness, is my source of strength, of joy and of peace.

Be near me Father, through Your omnipresence;
You do not miss a move that I make; aware of every step I take.
Do not allow my sin to overtake me.
Help me to lead a disciplined life.
Let not my foolish decisions trap me in a dead end.

Be near me Father, through the Holy Spirit;
That everything I do begin with Your inspiration,
Continue with Your help, and
Reach perfection under Your guidance.
I hope to know the promise of Jesus, when He said to his disciples “I’m in my Father, and you’re in me, and I’m in you.”

Be near me Father, through Your Word.
As I read Your Word, let me hear You speaking.
As I read the psalms, let me hear You singing.
A I reflect on each page, let me see Your image.
Give me the strength of will to put Your Word into practice all the days of my life.

In the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit.

Amen.

November 28, 2007 Posted by ngbc | Christianity, Everyday faith, God, Gospel, Holy Spirit, Prayer | | No Comments Yet

Chris Moyles: Not Exactly Gospel

The Story of a Man and His Mouth

Hate him or rate him, radio has never been the same since the day Mr. Chris Moyles first donned a pair of headphones. Probably the biggest phenomenon to hit the airwaves in the late nineties, Chris has sat behind the microphone for the last ten years, the self-proclaimed and undisputed ‘Saviour of Radio 1’. This is the story of the chubby teenager obsessed with the crazy dream of becoming a famous DJ. This is the story of how a good Catholic boy got to bring along his mother to meet Ant and Dec. This is the story of a man and his mouth. Welcome to The Gospel According to Chris Moyles.

Appropriately enough for the start of a ‘gospel’ there are plenty of parallels between the Nativity and Chris’s entry into the world. He was born into a humble, hardworking and religious family. There was no privilege for him growing up. Holiday trips to his mother’s native Ireland meant cramming his family into an aunt’s or uncle’s place. His mother was also responsible for raising the young Chris as a Roman Catholic. Chris attended religious schools throughout his education and was even educated by nuns at primary school, one of whom he refers to affectionately as ‘little miss nun.’ This makes sense of his consistent use of Christian language and even the ‘blessing’ which closes the book.

At twelve, Chris was already a radio nut – a self-confessed airwaves addict. By sheer pester power and determination, he managed to get a voluntary job at a hospital radio station in Wakefield, close to his home in Leeds. Cutting his teeth at this early stage allowed the teenage Chris to get the basics under his belt before leaving school. Remarkably for someone so young, Moyles had found his vocation for life. And so it came to pass that even before the ink was dry on his GCSE papers, he already had paid work lined up as a DJ at ‘Topshop Radio’.

If that sounds ambitious, that was only the beginning. What follows is a detailed blow by blow account of Chris’s career. No successes go untrumpeted, but equally no failures are glossed over. Passing through work for a string of stations, usually getting into trouble due to his controversial style, getting fired twice, picking himself up each time and starting again. Moyles has an indefatigable spirit. It’s all there: the unbelievable board room encounters, the cat and mouse pay negotiations, the betrayals and the big breaks. The climax is his arrival at the Radio 1 studios where he ascended to his throne, the pinnacle of national radio broadcasting: the Breakfast Show.

Through it all, Chris is remarkably matter of fact and, to be frank, remarkably defamatory of several of his former bosses and colleagues. To most, though, he offers thanks, recognising that whatever his skills, he’s had many people fighting his corner throughout his career. This is classic Moyles style and will be familiar to anyone who has tuned in to his show. Chris’s life becomes the show, which is often carried by his anecdotes, feuds with other DJs, or pet hates. Somehow, Chris’s cheeky chappy image allows him to get away with it, although clearly he hasn’t had it all his own way.

One of the striking features of the book, and of Moyles in general, is that it is full of knowing contradictions. Chris is well aware of the exceptional nature of his rise to fame, and revels in his ordinary working class background as much as in any of the celebrity encounters he has since enjoyed. Images of cringe-worthy birthday snaps featuring three year old Chris in brown and pink dungarees sit alongside a photo of the sharp-dressing Moyles hobnobbing with the Queen. The whole book presents an unlikely fulfilment of the dream of an oddly talented, oddly shaped, oddly dressed boy.

Was his success the product of talent, determination, help of friends or blind fortune? Moyles immodestly leans toward the first two, but comes across as genuinely grateful to those that helped him out over the years. Oddly, luck doesn’t get a mention. There’s no mention of ‘being in the right place at the right time’, for example. Self-belief permeates all of Chris’ writing and broadcasting, and this may be the most important ingredient in his rise.

Career focus plays an important role in Chris’ life. He repeatedly describes his attitude to his career as business-like and professional. Listening to his show, one could be forgiven for doubting this. He is hardly cast in the mould of the respectable gentleman DJ, frequently talking about little else than himself. When he’s not sounding off against high-profile colleagues or celebrities, he has, in my view, come over as childish, indulgent or just plain arrogant. No wonder, then, that he needs to emphasise his professionalism repeatedly to radio executives. With them he goes straight to the bottom line of the ratings. This is another knowing contradiction then: deliberately ‘childish professionalism.’ Moyles is no fool and his success is no coincidence. Perhaps Moyles is a lot smarter than he projects, and is playing just dumb enough to gain the sympathy of the listeners?

There is, however, no cynicism detectable in Moyles’s approach to his work. Self-interest certainly features strongly, but no cutting ruthlessness. Alongside the career focus is a strong family focus, a sense of pride and closeness that fame appears not to have affected. 2004, the year of his ascent to the Breakfast Show on Radio 1, which he describes as ‘the greatest year of my career’, is also described as ‘the most worrying year in my personal and family life’. Both his parents were seriously ill and needed operations, dad with heart trouble and mum with breast cancer. Chris is uninhibited about his family:

I live for my family and I’m not ashamed or embarrassed to say it. I love my parents and my brother so much that I honestly don’t know what I’d do without them. I longed for this awful period to be over so that we could all sit down with a sign of relief, knowing that all four of us were fine.

Plenty of critics have panned Chris over the years for his superficiality, his sexism toward women and his outspoken and often thoughtless humiliation of anyone who has crossed him. If he wasn’t an extremely sophisticated comedian, he would be staring law suit after law suit in the face. For example, take his description on air of one of the members of the band Girls Aloud as ‘The ropey looking ginger one at the back.’ Unsurprisingly this observation did not go down well with the guest in question, which Chris justifies as follows:

‘I’m not a bad person. I genuinely don’t want to upset anybody. Well there are a few I wouldn’t mind upsetting. But generally speaking I don’t. Look most of my audience know that I’m a nice guy . . . so sometimes I say things for a cheap laugh. You know, the kind of comments you make down the pub . . . with your mates. It’s a joke. They’re just words.’

It is telling that ‘the audience’ are seen as the arbiters of what is acceptable broadcasting, rather than a recognition of the BBC’s charter for public service. Although I find Moyles amusing on most occasions, he sometimes crosses the line as far as I’m concerned. The point is that he isn’t down the pub, he’s broadcasting to the nation. While he is running down himself, or the team that make his show, he is on safe ground, yet he rarely confines himself to these subjects. In many ways Chris’s reputation rests on controversy and continually pushing the boundaries. In this respect, Chris comes across like some of the rather self-amused pupils I’ve taught over the past few years – driven by reputation and the presence of an audience into increasingly inappropriate behaviour.

His use of language in the book is still less inhibited than his broadcasting and would no doubt have shocked ‘little miss nun.’ It mirrors the frequency of expletives one might overhear in a drunken Friday night conversation between any two blokes down the local boozer. Why it is necessary to write in far cruder terms than those he uses on air escapes me. Clearly he is talented enough to be amusing without swearing, so why bother with it at all?

Chris’s act revolves around the world as he sees it. His radio show is indeed ‘The Gospel according to Chris Moyles’: it is the unvarnished, incontrovertible and honest truth, at least as far as a self-confessed ‘overweight, beer-drinking, cigarette smoking, lazy [man]’ understands it. In my view Chris’s attempts at telling it like it is are generally fairly accurate and amusing and that makes him the talent that he is.

So how does ‘the Saviour of Radio 1’ compare to the original? Both found a vocation early in life which seemed ridiculous to family and friends at first. Both devoted their lives to telling the story of their own lives to as many as they could. They were unashamed of where they were coming from and had a pretty good idea of where they were headed. Both used life in all its richness to share stories which amused and challenged their audiences by ‘telling it how it is’.

Yet whereas Chris declares ‘I’m not a bad person’, Christ refused to accept praise for being a good person. Christ told it how it was, but he also shared how it could be. To the jokes and irony he shared concerning the evils of his day, Christ added hope. He not only modelled what a good life was; through his death and resurrection he made it possible that his followers could live in the fullness of that good life – a life lived not to achieve personal glory, but glory for God: ‘the mystery is that Christ lives in you, and he is your hope of sharing in God’s glory’ (Colossians 1:27 CEV)

I believe that we live with a deep sense of irony within society thanks to Chris Moyles and others who articulate this better than most. However, Christ alone offers not only diagnosis, but also the cure.

Author: Roland Sokolowski

November 16, 2007 Posted by ngbc | Book Reviews, Christianity, Current Events | | No Comments Yet

Listening to the voice of the lost: “I drew the cross”

179.jpg
  Courtney Davidson writes:  “I Drew the Cross” is a photographic interpretation of a written Christian testimony in which the author recalls drawing a cross on the bathroom wall as a cry for deliverance from the abuse happening to him at school. It is a part of a body of work that represents my visual interpretation of different aspects of written and spoken testimonies. I look for important moments within the story that serve as turning points or markers in that person’s spiritual journey and then re-create them based on my interpretation of the account. The resulting photograph becomes a portrait of a defining moment in their walk with God. See Christians in Visual Arts (CIVA) at http://www.civa.org/gallery.php?subID=100&galID=7&art=179

November 14, 2007 Posted by ngbc | Christianity, God, Searching for God, The Cross | | No Comments Yet

Stepping up to be counted: A weekly take on the news

Each few weeks the pastor chats over a few news items from the UK daily papers.

This week’s take on the news is all about choosing. The Bible says “Choose today whom you will serve” (Joshua 24) and that’s about the shape of it every day of our lives, isn’t it? We choose. We make our choices –like our beds- and then live according to their consequences.

Here’s an interesting list of people who have chosen to step up and be counted.Interesting to read –for example- about Tony Blair’s imminent choice of the Roman Catholic Church. For some reason it reminded me of the Emperor Constantine only being baptised in the face of his –ahem- imminent departure from office. Catherine Pepinster, the editor of The Tablet predicts that says the service will take place during a private mass held by Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O’Connor in the Cardinal’s official residence “some time this month”. Although Mr Blair’s wife and children are Roman Catholic, it is thought that he delayed converting from Anglicanism because of sensitivities in some quarters over having a Catholic Prime Minister. Some ridiculous prejudice that survived the 1829 Emancipation Act. Comment? I think any kind of Christian faith stance among political leaders (that is not designed to garner votes) is laudable and important. www.guardian.co.uk/guardianpolitics/story/0,,2208128,00.html

The choice of  Pope Benedict to receive King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia gives ‘hopes for warmer Christian–Muslim relations.’ That editorial line is probably a bit hyper –newscopy-speak. But the fact remains that any dialogue is good. How can it be otherwise? And it gives the Pople the opportunity to speak for the million-plus Christians who work in Saudi. Remember that non-Christian worship is technically against the law there. Discussions also focused on the need for inter-religious collaboration in the cause of peace and on finding a ‘just solution’ in Israel-Palestine. www.thetablet.co.uk/issues/1000073  The choice the Pople made was either to attempt to  talk things over or stew in the juices of perceived outrage . Good call.

And some fascinating choices from the public. I wonder who was ultimately responsible for the selection of angels for the Christmas stamps out this week? It was a safe choice, no doubt, but a bit Christian for these supposedly post-Christendom days?

And how on earth (or heaven) did Joel Edwards get appointed to the Equality and Human Rights Commission. (EHRC). Joel is the general director of Evangelical Alliance, of course,  but the new appointment gives him a voice in an entirely new arena. Revd Richard Kirker of the Lesbian and Gay Christian Movement said he was ‘stunned’ because he questioned how Mr Edwards would be able to uphold gay equality ‘with a clear conscience’. And Terry Sanderson of the National Secular Society called for an ‘urgent rethink’. The new commission merges three UK equality watchdogs, the Commission for Racial Equality, the Equal Opportunities Commission and the Disability Rights Commission. The EA leader said, ‘one of my primary responsibilities will be to ensure that the values of faith communities – our concerns for important issues such as respect and tolerance – play an important role in this commission.’ www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article2827402.ece. Fascinating! Watch this space.  Would you accept such a nomination?  Salt and light? Ring any bells?

The same element of choosing by courageous Christian believers resulted in the grant of the ‘Pursuer of Peace Award’ from the Woolf Institute of Abrahamic Faiths, Cambridge to Canon Andrew White, Anglican Vicar of St George’s Church in Baghdad and International Director of the Iraqi Institute of Peace. According to the report, he played a key role in negotiating a ‘fatwa against violence’, the first step on the pathway to reconciliation in Iraq between the rival Sunni and Shia factions. Canon White said that the fatwa would equate to statutory authority for all Shia and Sunni Muslims in Iraq and was to be signed by two of their respective, most senior leaders. The Woolf Institute announced that Canon White would receive the award for his ‘tireless work in bringing hope to broken people in a torn region.’ www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article2830563.ece

And check out the four English bishops who have voiced support for Rt Revd Robert Duncan, Bishop of Pittsburgh, after the US Presiding Bishop threatened legal action against his diocese. Presiding Bishop Katherine Jefferts Schori sent the warning last week after Bishop Duncan’s diocese voted to change its constitution, allowing it to align itself with an Anglican province it considers in line with official Anglican teaching. Bishop of Rochester, Dr Michael Nazir-Ali, said the group ‘stands with’ Bishop Duncan and all ‘who respond positively’ to the Communion’s position on the current homosexuality debate. Dr Peter Forster, Bishop of Chester, said the four bishops were not endorsing decisions taken at the Pittsburgh diocese but ‘a pastoral, healing approach’ rather than litigation was needed to ‘find a way forward’. The Church of England Newspaper reports that over 40 members of the English General Synod have also backed Bishop Duncan. www.churchtimes.co.uk/content.asp?id=47153

Interesting, finally, to hear that the BBC is showing a one-off comedy sitcom this Sunday featuring  David Tennant  (Dr Who), as a geeky Christian driving instructor (BBC1, 9 pm). The Baptist Times describes Learners as a ‘note-perfect comedy drama’. Characters include Tennant as nice but nerdy Chris, learner driver Bev, who fancies him and Chris’s brash female boss who is a Buddhist.  Baptist Times (9/11).  Has the “Christian” become  a sufficiently mainstream  stereotype for him to be pilloried thus? Do you hope so? Or do you hope not?!

November 12, 2007 Posted by ngbc | Baptist, Christianity, Current Events, Everyday faith, Taking on the news, What's happening?, faith | | No Comments Yet

Calvin on Jesus

To take away our condemnation, it was not enough for him to suffer any kind of death:  to make satisfaction for our redemption a form of death had to be chosen in which he might free us both by transferring our condemnation to himself and by taking our guilt upon himself.  If he had been murdered by thieves or slain in an insurrection by a raging mob, in such a death there would have been no evidence of satisfaction.  But when he was arraigned before the judgment seat as a criminal, accused and pressed by testimony and condemned by the mouth of the judge to die – we know by these proofs that he took the role of a guilty man and evildoer.

John Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion

November 11, 2007 Posted by ngbc | Calvin, Christianity, God, Gospel, Jesus | | No Comments Yet

Remember and Reflect

A wonderful time today, with many thanks to Nick and Chris for the superb Remembrance display in the coffee lounge, and a carefully prepared time of worship.

For those who requested the sermon outline, here it is: nehemiah-9.ppt

And here’s that interesting quote from Brux Austin:

Brux Austin, Editor-in-chief of the Texas Business magazine:

n     “We are truly the lost generation, huffing and puffing down the fast track to nowhere, always looking to the dollar sign for direction. That’s the only standard we recognize. We have no built-in beliefs, no ethical boundaries. Cheat on your taxes, just don’t get caught. Cheat on your wife, just don’t get AIDS. Simply use a condom.”

n      “Where did I go wrong?” is the traditional wail of parents of kids-gone-wrong. The eighties version says, “We gave him everything — clothes, a computer, a car, a college education.” Everything but a conscience. We are products of a high-tech society; amoral automatons outfitted with calculating brains and sleek casings, just like the computers with which we are so compatible. But they forgot to give us souls.”

n       “What good is lolling in your Jacuzzi in the beautiful backyard of your breathtaking home if you feel an aching emptiness in your innards — a chronic pain that all the wine cooler in the world can’t numb?”

 

November 11, 2007 Posted by ngbc | Church, Everyday faith, God, Gospel, faith, family | | No Comments Yet

Possibly the best music in the world

November 10, 2007 Posted by ngbc | Possibly the best music in the world | | No Comments Yet

“Consider their threats…” Reviewing the News

Those words in Acts 4 are in the context of Christians gathering in prayer as they face serious opposition. We too ought to “consider their threats.” We have to keep our eyes open to the things that face us in our generation and in our society. Bear in mind, though, that the next words of the prayer was that God might “Enable your servants to speak your word with boldness.”

I guess that’s what Westboro Baptist Church (an independent fellowship) thought they were doing when they picketed the funerals of American soldiers killed in Iraq claiming their deaths are a punishment for American tolerance of homosexuality. Grieving father Albert Snyder sued the church after members demonstrated at the funeral of his son, Marine Lance Corporal Matthew Snyder, who was killed in Iraq. Apparently, the church – composed largely of members of its leader’s relatives – regularly attends military funerals waving banners declaring ‘God hates fags’ and ‘Thank God for dead soldiers’. A Baltimore jury ruled that the church had violated the family’s privacy and deliberately inflicted emotional distress and fined it $10.9 million. Whatever you might think about the present line on homosexuality being taken by Western governments, I can’t believe that any Christian could read the Bible and come up with this as a viable response! What do you think? In this context, the “threat” that I “consider” comes not from an oppressive state power (as in Acts 4) but from crazy Christians who make me feel ashamed.

 A different kind of response to the threats of state power comes from Zimbabwe. The respected and retired bishop Dr Sebastian Bakare has been elected as acting Bishop of Harare, to replace President Mugabe supporter Bishop Nolbert Kunonga. Dr Kunonga recently declared the diocese’s independence of the Province of Central Africa, leading the Province to declare the post vacant. Dr Bakare has been lecturing in theology at the African University in Mutare. While admitting some reluctance because of the challenges he would face, he said, ‘I think this is something I cannot run away from’. The acting Bishop said he would not urge Anglicans who had followed Bishop Kunonga to return but would prioritise those remaining in the Communion and the essential work of ‘challenging things that are evil’. Consider their threats, Lord, and enable your servant to speak your word with boldness…

There are many things that may fill us with trepidation. We live in dangerous times. I join in the concern about the Government plans to extend the current 28-day period in which police can hold terrorist suspects. In an official response to the proposals, the C of E’s mission and public affairs council warned against a ‘hasty or adversarial’ change to the current time limit. They stressed that protecting the public must be balanced against the need to protect the rights of suspects. The council said ‘convincing evidence’ would be needed to demonstrate that ‘liberty and security stand in conflict’. Instead, it called for the police to focus on bringing successful prosecutions through the criminal justice system. One fears that the need to produce results and the genuine fears of the public –which a mischievous media might easily whip into hysteria- might fudge the important issues of human rights and the precision with which justice is served.

I always enjoy the speeches of John Sentamu, the Archbishop of York. He seems to have a handle on the big picture (and also tells great jokes). At a conference in Hull marking the work of abolitionist William Wilberforce, he cited research connecting child labour with cocoa production. According to the Stop the Traffik campaign, 12,000 trafficked children work on Ivory Coast plantations to farm 43 per cent of the world’s cocoa beans. Stop the Traffik claims that manufacturers who don’t subscriber to Fair Trade practices cannot guarantee that their chocolate is produced without child labour. The irony, The Times points out, is that most of Britain’s original chocolate makers were Quakers, who spearheaded the campaign to end slavery. Sentamu called for consumers to boycott chocolate that isn’t fairly traded to help end child labour.

I guess these stories are all about the collision between state and church. A slightly less serious news item –loosely on the same topic- comes from Leipzig. What do you do when you discover a rich seam of coal underneath a village? The German authorities decided to evacuate the village. The villagers steadfastly refused, however, unless their 700 year old church was moved too!  Well, removers this week delivered the historic building to a new location after strapping it to the back of a huge flat-bed truck. The Migbrag mining company paid £2 million for the removal job after learning that the Emmaus Church and surrounding village of Heursdorf, near Leipzig were sitting above 50 million tonnes of brown coal.

Finally, I enjoy the similar “David and Goliath” feel to the story in Christian Today. A Christian couple who felt forced to stop fostering because they were required to sign up to the Government’s Sexual Orientation Regulations (SORs) have won the right to have their conscientious objections recognized. This Wednesday Somerset social services leaders told Mr Vince Matherick and his wife Pauline they would not now have to discuss same-sex relationships with their 11-year-old foster son. Andrea Williams of the Lawyers Christian Fellowship said, ‘This is a significant step forward … in that the Council has agreed not to force Mr and Mrs Matherick to act against their Christian beliefs.’

November 7, 2007 Posted by ngbc | Christianity, Current Events, Taking on the news, What's happening? | | No Comments Yet